Thursday, October 28, 2010

Indiana Rules Drafted for Parenting Time Coordination

The Domestic Relations Committee of the Indiana Judicial Center met on Friday 22 October 2010. The morning session of the meeting was a joint session between the Domestic Relations Committee and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee.

Subcommittees of the two committees had been working on proposed rules for parenting time coordination. A draft of the Indiana Rules for Parenting Coordination was presented and discussed.

It was the intention of the committees when drafting these rules that Parenting Time Coordination [PTC] should be used as a last resort and that mediation or other alternatives first be sought. They do not believe it is intended for all cases but only high-conflict parties.

Currently PTC must be agreed to by the parties who pay the costs. It is usually a result of the judge encouraging the parties to seek resolution of their disputed issues before returning to contest them in court.

Parties engaged in PTC pay a retainer and sign a contract that stipulates the costs to the parties. Hourly rates vary between $50-$200 in current cases. Mark Lloyd, Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee Chair, stated that it costs much less for the parties to sit down with a Parenting Coordinator [PC] than to continue paying two attorneys to litigate the issues. Johnson County has a provision for indigent parties to have ADR opportunities.

Judge Thomas Milligan, Montgomery County Superior Court, stated that the most contentious and litigious cases involve pro se parties. This is the same thing that I have found to be true as most of my clients for litigation coaching have either spent themselves into poverty fighting or have been rejected by or fired attorneys who will not carry forth with frivolous battles.

Currently 15 states have rules or statutes on PTC. Some states permit PTC to be ordered without agreement of the parties. However, a judge can't require the parties to pay for it if judge orders it.`Hendricks Superior Court Judge Karen Love said she has forced it on parties who didn't want it but after participating were glad they did. Johnson County has a program that pays for PTC for parties who are indigent but ordered into PTC by the judge.

One of my legislative proposals for the upcoming session of the Indiana General Assembly will require that the parties in a disputed child custody action meet with a mediator before appearing in court. The mediator will provide an initial report to the court about what the contested issues are and what he or she believes the degree of conflict between the parties to be.

Judges need to be educated on the availability and benefits of PTC so they will recommend or push it on the parties. Having established rules will make the process more effective and help judges to feel more secure in ordering or facilitating PTC.

The committees worked on revising the proposed PTC rules throughout the day. The DRC had been scheduled to hear proposals by Judge William Fee and Judge Karen Love related to two sections of the Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines. Parenting Time to Occur as Planned and Enforcement of Parenting Time, Contempt and Resolution of Problems will be presented at the next meeting which is scheduled for 19 November 2010.

Stuart Showalter's Political FaceBook page

Subscribe

Indiana Custodial Rights Advocates

©2010 Stuart Showalter, LLC. Permission is granted to all non-commercial entities to reproduce this article in it's entirety with credit given.

1 comment:

Cattura7673 said...

"Mark Lloyd, Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee Chair, stated that it costs much less for the parties to sit down with a Parenting Coordinator [PC] than to continue paying two attorneys to litigate the issues. Johnson County has a provision for indigent parties to have ADR opportunities."
I wanted to respond to this - I am "K.L." in the for publication case "In re Paternity of C.H.
936 N.E.2d 1270
Ind.App.,2010." I would be more than happy to share my brief and petition for rehearing with you so that you can see that The Honorable Mark Loyd has no idea how Parenting Coordination is actually being administered in the Johnson County Juvenile Court that is under his "supervision" . I am at 125% of the federal poverty level, qualify for food stamps, yet at the Magistrate "discretion" parents will have to pay the court picked PC - whatever the PC says the fee is. In our case the court chosen PC required $400.00 upfront from each parent for retainer ($800.00 total up front - $150.00 each time there is a hearing and $100.00 per hour. This adds up quickly and I have be threatened with contempt - NOT for a Parenting Plan issue - but for not being able to pay the PC. Appointment duration and frequency is determined by the PC, and the PC enjoys "expert" status under Indiana trial rules so they can testify to hear say and "opinion". - I would suggest that Hoosiers Do not make a PC upset; for you could pay the price, in more than one way - Hoosiers as of now can lose their liberty, money and custody, simply for not being able to cough up the cash to a PC. This is not a gender issue, it is an issue of freedom. In our case neither of us (parents) were offered any ADR program or assistance that Judge Loyd speaks of from your blog, in fact I was appointed a Public Defender because I could not pay the PC the $400.00 upfront fee. (Obviously I couldn't afford an attorney - so one was appointed to me)I would like to reiterate that neither the father nor I have been held in contempt or have violated our parenting plan. Please check the facts before posting this information. I would be happy to provide you any documentation you need to actually know what is really happening in our family courts. Thanks!